So here's the facts. The baby polar bear was abandoned by it's parents (pricks). Meaning nature would have it die rather than live. But some humans, monstrous humans are raising and feeding it now since nature shat it out.
But apparently "Feeding by hand is not species-appropriate but a gross violation of animal protection laws,"...
2 comments:
Proper handling procedures are to avoid interfering with the decision of the mother bear. If the mother bear does not think the younger one should survive, then people should not interfere because the mother bear knows best. It's possible this bear cub is not of the proper caliber. If that is the case, then the animal should die. Now that we saved it, the activists (excepts maybe one or two) think the animal should stay alive. Most of them were simply pointing out it was a mistake to interfere... especially since they are now thinking about raising this bear as a stud bear. Why stud a bear that is so inferior it was abandoned by its mother?
I agree, which means put it in a zoo if nature kicked it out of it's natural habitat.
This isn't Sparta, lol.
Post a Comment